caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / Atom feed
* [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx
@ 2019-04-25  2:53 Андрей Бергман
  2019-04-25  3:21 ` Hendrik Boom
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Андрей Бергман @ 2019-04-25  2:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: caml users

Hello,

what is the preferred OSS license for ppx? Can it be GPL?

Sincerely,
    Andrey.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx
  2019-04-25  2:53 [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx Андрей Бергман
@ 2019-04-25  3:21 ` Hendrik Boom
  2019-04-29 10:42   ` Jeremie Dimino
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hendrik Boom @ 2019-04-25  3:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: caml-list

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 05:52:48AM +0300, Андрей Бергман wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> what is the preferred OSS license for ppx? Can it be GPL?

Whatever other licenses are used, there should be a licence that's at 
least GPL-compatible.

-- hendrik

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx
  2019-04-25  3:21 ` Hendrik Boom
@ 2019-04-29 10:42   ` Jeremie Dimino
  2019-04-29 23:56     ` Hendrik Boom
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeremie Dimino @ 2019-04-29 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hendrik Boom; +Cc: caml users

We are using MIT for all the ppx rewriters released by Jane Street.

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 4:21 AM Hendrik Boom <hendrik@topoi.pooq.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 05:52:48AM +0300, Андрей Бергман wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > what is the preferred OSS license for ppx? Can it be GPL?
>
> Whatever other licenses are used, there should be a licence that's at
> least GPL-compatible.
>
> -- hendrik



-- 
Jeremie

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx
  2019-04-29 10:42   ` Jeremie Dimino
@ 2019-04-29 23:56     ` Hendrik Boom
  2019-04-30  0:42       ` Андрей Бергман
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hendrik Boom @ 2019-04-29 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: caml-list

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:42:28AM +0100, Jeremie Dimino wrote:
> We are using MIT for all the ppx rewriters released by Jane Street.

That seems sufficient.

-- hendrik

> 
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 4:21 AM Hendrik Boom <hendrik@topoi.pooq.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 05:52:48AM +0300, Андрей Бергман wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > what is the preferred OSS license for ppx? Can it be GPL?
> >
> > Whatever other licenses are used, there should be a licence that's at
> > least GPL-compatible.
> >
> > -- hendrik
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeremie

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx
  2019-04-29 23:56     ` Hendrik Boom
@ 2019-04-30  0:42       ` Андрей Бергман
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Андрей Бергман @ 2019-04-30  0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hendrik Boom; +Cc: caml-list

Thanks a lot, Hendrik and Jeremie!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-04-25  2:53 [Caml-list] the preferred license for ppx Андрей Бергман
2019-04-25  3:21 ` Hendrik Boom
2019-04-29 10:42   ` Jeremie Dimino
2019-04-29 23:56     ` Hendrik Boom
2019-04-30  0:42       ` Андрей Бергман

caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list

Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://inbox.ocaml.org/caml-list

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox